Bruce Momjian writes:
> Do we have enough time to test the patch before the minor releases?
Sure, it's not like it raises any portability issues. As long as it
gives a better error message than before in some common cases, it'll
be a step forward, even if we think of further improvements later.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No objections here but since I don't use a foreign lang I figure my vote
> > doesn't really matter. I was wondering though if it would be resonable to
> > try
> > and get some language updates into the patch release?
>
> With the cur
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No objections here but since I don't use a foreign lang I figure my vote
> doesn't really matter. I was wondering though if it would be resonable to try
> and get some language updates into the patch release?
With the current re-release plans it'd take a
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 20:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> A reasonable objection to either Plan A or Plan C is that it will add
> error strings that are not currently in the translation message files;
> which wouldn't matter for a HEAD-only patch, but I'd really like to
> back-patch this into 8.1. Pla
I wrote:
>> I'm thinking about whether we can't improve the message for "missing
>> FROM-clause entry" to somehow account for situations where the table
>> does exist in the query but it's referenced from an improper place,
>> ...
> On further investigation, this is arguably a regression in 8.1.
>
I wrote:
> I'm thinking about whether we can't improve the message for "missing
> FROM-clause entry" to somehow account for situations where the table
> does exist in the query but it's referenced from an improper place,
> as in bug #2130 (filed a couple hours ago, not yet visible in mail list
> ar
I'm thinking about whether we can't improve the message for "missing
FROM-clause entry" to somehow account for situations where the table
does exist in the query but it's referenced from an improper place,
as in bug #2130 (filed a couple hours ago, not yet visible in mail list
archives):
SELECT ..
