On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, sorry for hijacking... ummm how did I do that?
You replied to a post instead of creating a new, unrelated e-mail. It
is different.
Just try to use threaded mode of your e-mail client and you'll get
the idea.
Regards
Tometzky
--
...although
On Jan 8, 2008 1:04 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, sorry for hijacking... ummm how did I do that?
>
> Anyway I'll thank you for giving a "sign of life" when I was almost loosing
> my hopes to get any kind of answer from "-hackers".
Don't forget that we're just a few days/weeks of 8.3 rele
hehe
Thanks for your attention.
Manolo.
--
From: "Decibel!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 12:34 AM
To: "Manolo _" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementing Sorting Refinements
You'l
You'll get better response if you don't hijack threads. :) Also,
there's nothing in here that describes what the benefits of this
change are.
On Jan 1, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Manolo _ wrote:
Hi to all.
This mail is aimed at asking some suggestion to face PostgreSQL
(PG) development to implem
Hi to all.
This mail is aimed at asking some suggestion to face PostgreSQL (PG)
development to implement a refinement to PG source code. I'll briefly summarize
the idea of the "2-Way Replacement Selection" (2WRS) refinement, just in case.
If you already remember what 2WRS is, you can please ju
