Re: [HACKERS] IPv6 patch rejected

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I didn't read my email this weekend, so I am sorry to be late getting back to you on this. First, let me say I am excited about this patch. Several people have asked for IPv6 support, but you are the first person to actually submit a patch for it. I want to comment on the patch a bit because IP

Re: [HACKERS] IPv6 patch rejected

2002-12-07 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am pretty sure it is going to fail if your machine isn't INET6 aware, > which may be many. That's definitely not gonna do :-( regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: su

Re: [HACKERS] IPv6 patch rejected

2002-12-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
I now have the INETv6 patch working using IPv4 on my machine, and I don't have IPv6 enabled in my kernel. Tomorrow, I will review the entire patch for portability issues, then post it so others can test it. I am pretty sure it is going to fail if your machine isn't INET6 aware, which may be many.

[HACKERS] IPv6 patch rejected

2002-12-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
The INETv6 patch was rejected because of this report, and an error on postmaster startup from BSD/OS: LOG: FATAL: StreamServerPort: getaddrinfo2() failed: hostname nor servname provided, or not known Please submit a new patch that addresses these issues. I can work with you to