Re: [HACKERS] INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation

2001-09-03 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
ch > Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2001 5:18 AM > To: Hackers List > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation > > > > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have a copy of an SQL99 draft which seems to be reasonably complete. > > afaik we hav

Re: [HACKERS] INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation

2001-09-01 Thread Ken Hirsch
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have a copy of an SQL99 draft which seems to be reasonably complete. > afaik we haven't come across an actual released version. Let me know if > you want me to forward it; perhaps it is on the ftp or web site? ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/doc/sql/s

Re: [HACKERS] INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation

2001-08-31 Thread Thomas Lockhart
(back on list) > As far as I can see, it is the same. My examples come from Cannan and Otten > on SQL92, but I read the spec for SQL99 and I can't see any obvious > change, except that INTERVAL YEAR TO YEAR (and any other X TO X) is no > longer allowed. (I take it you have a copy of SQL99?) W

[HACKERS] INTERVAL type: SQL92 implementation

2001-08-28 Thread Oliver Elphick
If full SQL92 implementation of INTERVAL would be a welcome addition, could it be added as a TODO item? I would like to work on it, since I want to use some features that are not currently supported. SQL92 INTERVAL data type (also SQL99, I think): ::= INTERVAL {{ TO } |