Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
>
> What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege information
> for all objects in psql?
OK, item wording updated.
--
Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:41:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and
> > \l+
>
> What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege
> information for all objects in psql?
Ex
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
What about, develop a consistent way to display privilege information
for all objects in psql?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---
Added to TODO:
* Allow psql to display permission information using \df+ and \l+
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
> >
> > So far, \z and \dp have shown privi
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
should we move the schema and tablespace display to, say
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> IMHO the \dn+ output would get too wide if you do that. I'd be in favor
> of using \z to display permissions of the object in \d
I think it's time to start with longer command names. Tab completion makes
it easy anyway. The short ones should still be
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
> > >
> > > So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
> > >
> > > Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas a
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
> >
> > So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
> >
> > Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
> >
> > Should we,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
>
> So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
>
> Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
>
> Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
> should we move
Maybe other people want to comment on this issue.
So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables.
Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces.
Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or
should we move the schema and tablespace display to, s
10 matches
Mail list logo