Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Sunday 15 June 2008 23:01:16 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to > > see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors > > are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsor

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote: David Fetter wrote: I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a , per my TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. This describes how to *develop* a feature, not how to *sponsor* it. I d

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Andrew Dunstan wrote: Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsors in picking a development company to deal with. +1 Joshua

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Peter Eisentraut wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement features, todos and bug fixes. I think the professional support company listing is already that list. Unfortunat

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:24:28AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a > > , per my > > TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. > > This describes how to *develop* a feat

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Greg Smith wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement features, todos and bug fixes. I think the professional support company

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement features, todos and bug fixes. I think the professional support company listing is already t

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Joshua D. Drake wrote: > In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of > companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement > features, todos and bug fixes. I think the professional support company listing is already that list. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailin

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

David Fetter wrote: > I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a > , per my > TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. This describes how to *develop* a feature, not how to *sponsor* it. I don't think this addresses the issues brough

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:27 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Incidentally, we have minutes from the meeting. Is it OK to publish > > them openly? > > There's a set of minutes already up at > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2008_Developer_Meetin

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Incidentally, we have minutes from the meeting. Is it OK to publish them openly? There's a set of minutes already up at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2008_Developer_Meeting There was no solution proposed to the escrow problem, nor to allow

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Decibel! wrote: On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, the sponsor's relation

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Decibel! wrote: > So were there decisions in the dev meeting about how the community wants > to handle people wanting to sponsor a project? Do they donate to SPI? Do > we have an escrow fund? Do we just point them at one of the "Postgres > Companies" and hope they're willing to pay for the whol

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, the sponsor's relationship with the d

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Greg Smith wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to >> deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, >> the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of >> payment

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Greg Smith wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of payment, etc. The

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote: If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development, the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of payment, etc. The bit on the wiki is hel

Re: [HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

David Fetter wrote: Folks, I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a , per my TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. Sorry about that. Anyhow, Jignesh has come up with a proposal template

[HACKERS] How to Sponsor a Feature

Folks, I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a , per my TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. Sorry about that. Anyhow, Jignesh has come up with a proposal template that could