Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Ahh, good point. ?I had not considered the table would change. ?What I
> > did was to mark "Slaves accept read-only queries" as "Hot only".
>
> Can the "warm standby" still reside in v9.0? If not, the mark of
> "Hot on
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ahh, good point. I had not considered the table would change. What I
> did was to mark "Slaves accept read-only queries" as "Hot only".
Can the "warm standby" still reside in v9.0? If not, the mark of
"Hot only" seems odd for me.
> I did
Markus Wanner wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Ah, I now realize it only mentions "warm" standby, not "hot", so I just
> > updated the documentation to reflect that; you can see it here:
>
> Maybe the table below also needs an update, because unlike "Warm Standby
> using PITR", a ho
On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I've always thought this feature was misnamed and nothing has happened
>> to change my mind, but it's not clear whether I'm in the majority.
>
> I'm afraid force of habit is more powerful than correctness on this one.
> It's going to be HS/SR whe
> I've always thought this feature was misnamed and nothing has happened
> to change my mind, but it's not clear whether I'm in the majority.
I'm afraid force of habit is more powerful than correctness on this one.
It's going to be HS/SR whether that's perfectly correct or not.
--Josh Berkus
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Do we want to call the feature "hot standby"? Is a read-only standby a
>> "standby" or a "slave"?
>
> I think hot standby is pretty much the term, now.
See here for the previous iteration of this discussion:
http://a
Bruce,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Ah, I now realize it only mentions "warm" standby, not "hot", so I just
updated the documentation to reflect that; you can see it here:
Maybe the table below also needs an update, because unlike "Warm Standby
using PITR", a hot standby accepts read-only queries an
Joshua Tolley wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Having concluded I really need to start playing with hot standby, I started
> looking for documentation on the subject. I found what I was looking for; I
> also found this page[1], which, it seems, ought to mention hot standby.
> Comments?
>
>
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 18:34 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> > Having concluded I really need to start playing with hot standby, I started
> > looking for documentation on the subject. I found what I was looking for; I
> > also found this page[1],
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> Having concluded I really need to start playing with hot standby, I started
> looking for documentation on the subject. I found what I was looking for; I
> also found this page[1], which, it seems, ought to mention hot standby.
> Comments?
>
>
Having concluded I really need to start playing with hot standby, I started
looking for documentation on the subject. I found what I was looking for; I
also found this page[1], which, it seems, ought to mention hot standby.
Comments?
[1] http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/high-availab
11 matches
Mail list logo
