Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-11 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 15:11 -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > I skimmed through the documentation to get a better handle on what > this will mean. Thanks for this and any further corrections/additions. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-11 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:00 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 20:36 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > Attached is the latest and greatest patch against CVS head, taken from > > the hs-riggs branch in my git repository. > > Is there a reason why recovery.conf.sample does not in

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-11 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Is there a reason why recovery.conf.sample does not include (sample) > entries for recovery_connections and max_standby_delay? No, they probably should be included. I'll add them, thanks. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pg

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-10 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Michael Glaesemann wrote: > Other commands are in all-caps. Any reason INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, > TRUNCATE, CREATE, DROP, ALTER, and COMMENT are not? No. Thanks, I'll fix that. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hac

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-10 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Nov 10, 2009, at 13:36 , Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Attached is the latest and greatest patch against CVS head, taken from the hs-riggs branch in my git repository. Awesome. Thank you, Simon and Heikki! I skimmed through the documentation to get a better handle on what this will mean.

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby status

2009-11-10 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 20:36 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Attached is the latest and greatest patch against CVS head, taken from > the hs-riggs branch in my git repository. Is there a reason why recovery.conf.sample does not include (sample) entries for recovery_connections and max_standby_de

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby status

2009-10-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:33 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> Let me know if I'm missing something. And please feel free to help, by >> testing, by reviewing and commenting on the patch, or by addressing any >> of the above issues. I will continue working on this, but this is

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby status

2009-10-15 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:33 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > There's been a lot of churn in hot standby since the beginning of the > commitfest, so I thought it would be good to summarize where we are. > > Attached is the latest and greatest patch against CVS head, taken from > the hs-riggs bra