On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Neil Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, if you've got any fixes you wanted to get into those branches,
> > time to get on it.
>
> I just wanted to note that IMHO a fix for the PL/PgSQL crash in
> 7.4.1 and HEAD (not sure about 7.3.x) that Chris Campbe
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if you've got any fixes you wanted to get into those branches,
> time to get on it.
I just wanted to note that IMHO a fix for the PL/PgSQL crash in
7.4.1 and HEAD (not sure about 7.3.x) that Chris Campbell recently
reported should definitely be included i
On Sunday 22 February 2004 05:57 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Do you think that we'll have too a RPM binary distribution for the 7.3.6
> ( the 7.3.5 don't have it yet ) ?
Yes. I apologize for the lag; my wife miscarried and that has thrown my free
time for a loop as I help her and my other four
Tom Lane wrote:
The core committee has agreed that it's about time to put out new
dot-releases in both the 7.3 and 7.4 branches. (The main thing forcing
this is the realization that permissions checks on view updates were
pretty badly broken by the now-reverted patch of 13-Feb-03 --- this
could b
The core committee has agreed that it's about time to put out new
dot-releases in both the 7.3 and 7.4 branches. (The main thing forcing
this is the realization that permissions checks on view updates were
pretty badly broken by the now-reverted patch of 13-Feb-03 --- this
could be labeled a secur
