Re: [HACKERS] HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect

2002-12-23 Thread Giles Lean
I wrote: > o so far I've only tested with the HP ANSI C compiler on 11.11, not > with gcc or on other HP-UX releases. > > I can test other releases and probably with gcc, but if someone gets > to it before me that would be just fine. I probably won't until the > new year. Today is quie

Re: [HACKERS] HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect

2002-12-22 Thread Giles Lean
I wrote: > My recommendation (with a pinch of salt, since I'm still not a HP-UX > toolchain guru) is to add > > +h lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$SO_MAJOR_VERSION) > > to the HP-UX LINK.shared line in src/Makefile.shlib, and to change the > way the symlinks run as well, so that libpq.sl is a link to

Re: [HACKERS] HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect

2002-12-22 Thread Giles Lean
Tom Lane wrote: > Probably so. I had not realized that HP's linker is affected by which > way the symlinks run, but it appears that it is. I've just spoken to someone who knows more about the HP-UX toolchain than I do. The situation is that the library can have an internal name if the +h optio

Re: [HACKERS] HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect

2002-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Giles Lean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. the libraries are installed with their base names such as >'libpq.sl' being regular files, with versioned names being >symbolic links to the base names: >This should be the other way around: Probably so. I had not realized that HP's linker i

[HACKERS] HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect

2002-12-22 Thread Giles Lean
Hi all, I'm planning an upgrade from 7.2.3 to 7.3.1 on some HP-UX systems. With the major number bump in 7.3.1 I was expecting to be able to do this upgrade without a flag day to re-compile clients, however due to misnaming of the PostgreSQL shared libraries on HP-UX I can't. A summary of the pr