On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 14:50 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Is there an infrastructure to use a different expected file depending
> on the LANG used?
Not really. A couple of years ago I did the same exercise you just did,
and we just fixed most of what was reasonable to fix by adjusting the
test case
Jeff Janes wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 6/19/13 9:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>>
Does anyone object to the attached change, so that regression tests
pass when run in a Danish locale? I think it should be
back-patched to 9.2, where the test
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 6/19/13 9:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> >> Does anyone object to the attached change, so that regression tests
> >> pass when run in a Danish locale? I think it should be
> >> back-patched to 9.2, where t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 19-06-2013 17:41, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> OK, pushed without the comment.
>
Works like a charm :)
Svenne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQI5BAE
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/19/13 9:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Does anyone object to the attached change, so that regression tests
>> pass when run in a Danish locale? I think it should be
>> back-patched to 9.2, where the test was introduced.
>
> Yes, that should be fixed. I wouldn't p
On 6/19/13 9:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Svenne Krap wrote:
>> On 18-06-2013 22:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>>>In Danish, apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
>>
>> Yes of course
>>
>> We have three extra vowels following Z (namely Æ, Ø and Å) and
>> for keyboard missing those
On 2013-06-19 15:23:16 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-06-19 06:18:20 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Svenne Krap wrote:
> > > On 18-06-2013 22:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >
> > >> In Danish, apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
> > >
> > > Yes of course
> > >
> > > We have
On 2013-06-19 06:18:20 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Svenne Krap wrote:
> > On 18-06-2013 22:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> >> In Danish, apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
> >
> > Yes of course
> >
> > We have three extra vowels following Z (namely Æ, Ø and Å) and
> > for keyboa
Svenne Krap wrote:
> On 18-06-2013 22:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> In Danish, apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
>
> Yes of course
>
> We have three extra vowels following Z (namely Æ, Ø and Å) and
> for keyboard missing those essential keys we have an official
> alternate way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 22:18, Jeff Janes wrote:
> In Danish, apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
Yes of course
We have three extra vowels following Z (namely Æ, Ø and Å) and for
keyboard missing those essential keys we have an official a
Jeff Janes wrote:
> The problem is the f1 > 'WA' part of the query. In Danish,
> apparently 'AA' > 'WA', so two more rows show up.
Thanks -- I didn't have the right locale installed, and wasn't
quite sure what package to install to get it.
So, the test is bad, rather than there being a product
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Svenne Krap wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 18-06-2013 21:41, Svenne Krap wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I will dig futher and get back...
>
> The regression test was added in 9.2, the earliest interesting commit is
> d6d5f67b5b98b168
Svenne Krap wrote:
> I am happy to run whatever relevant tests you can dream up, but I am
> fresh out of ideas :)
psql regression
begin;
drop index dupindexcols_i;
SELECT count(*) FROM dupindexcols
WHERE f1 > 'WA' and id < 1000 and f1 ~<~ 'YX';
rollback;
select f1 from dupindexcols where f1 li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 21:41, Svenne Krap wrote:
>
>
>
> I will dig futher and get back...
The regression test was added in 9.2, the earliest interesting commit is
d6d5f67b5b98b1685f9158e9d00a726afb2ae789,
where Tom Lane changes the definition to the curre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 21:14, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> But 9.2.4 does pass "make check", and only fails if you reproduce
those things manually?
>
No, I was lazy and used the (distribution-installed) 9.2
I have tried "make check" on REL_9_2_4 and that fails
Svenne Krap wrote:
> I have the information attached here instead...
I find it suspicious that the test is using an index which sorts
first by the "f1" column, then later by "f1 text_pattern_ops"
column. I'm not 100% sure whether the test is bad or you have
found a bug, although I suspect the l
Jeff Janes escribió:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Svenne Krap wrote:
> > As I have no real idea of what "~<~" is for an operator (I have looked
> > it up as scalarltjoinsel), but I cannot find any semantics for it in the
> > docs*... So I have no way of manually checking the expected resul
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Svenne Krap wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 18-06-2013 18:40, Svenne Krap wrote:
> > Any ideas what might have happened?
>
> After doing some more digging...
>
> My laptop (which runs PostgreSQL 9.2.4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 21:04, Svenne Krap wrote:
> (sk@[local]:5432) [sk] > \l
>
> List of databases
>
> Name | Owner | Encoding | Collate | Ctype| Access
> privileges
>
> -
Arghh... crappy mailer... I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 20:48, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> Apologies; I somehow missed the file attached to your initial post.
> That's the sort of thing I was looking for.
Aplogy accepted... :)
> Having reviewed that, the source code comments indicate it is fo
Svenne Krap wrote:
> On 18-06-2013 20:17, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>>> I was surprised to see that an index-test failed.
>>
>> It works for me. Could you paste or attach some detail?
>
> Gladly, if you tell me what would be relevant to attach :)
>
> I am brand new to the postgresql source code an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 20:17, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>> I was surprised to see that an index-test failed.
>
> It works for me. Could you paste or attach some detail?
>
>
Gladly, if you tell me what would be relevant to attach :)
I am brand new to the post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18-06-2013 18:40, Svenne Krap wrote:
> Any ideas what might have happened?
After doing some more digging...
My laptop (which runs PostgreSQL 9.2.4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled
by x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc (Gentoo 4.7.3 p1.0, pie-0.5.5) 4.7.
Svenne Krap wrote:
> current master 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984
> I was surprised to see that an index-test failed.
It works for me. Could you paste or attach some detail?
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent
Hi All.
I just subscribed to RRReviewers (that should be pronounce with a nice
rolling r-r-reviewers, right?)
As part of my getting up to speed, I tried to build and run test on the
current master 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984
Basically I did:
1) Clone into new dir
2) ./configure --en
25 matches
Mail list logo
