On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:50:17AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me add I don't agree with this, and find the whole GPL
> heavy-handedness very distasteful.
Please, not this again. Is there a piss-and-moan-about-the-GPL
schedule posted somewhere?
Either PG is in compliance, or it's not.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is an article about GPL and GPL version 3.0.
>
>
>http://icd.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&SubSection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=92350&VERSION_NUM=1
>
> The interesting thing is that Stallman says:
>
> "Our position is t
Here is an article about GPL and GPL version 3.0.
http://icd.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&SubSection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=92350&VERSION_NUM=1
The interesting thing is that Stallman says:
"Our position is that it makes no difference whether programs are linked
s
