Robert Haas writes:
> Actually, though, varstr_levenshtein_less_equal() never gets called
> from parse_relation.c with a distance bound of more than four, so it
> can't actually go quadratic. There's another call in that file to
> varstr_levenshtein(), which in retrospect looks silly, but I'm pre
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ redirecting from -docs, which isn't the best place to discuss code fixes ]
>
> Whoever thought this was a good idea:
>
> StaticAssertStmt(NAMEDATALEN <= MAX_LEVENSHTEIN_STRLEN,
> "Levenshtein hinting mechanism restricts N
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Whoever thought this was a good idea:
>
> StaticAssertStmt(NAMEDATALEN <= MAX_LEVENSHTEIN_STRLEN,
> "Levenshtein hinting mechanism restricts NAMEDATALEN");
>
> is nuts.
Then I must be nuts.
> A minimal fix that would not
[ redirecting from -docs, which isn't the best place to discuss code fixes ]
Whoever thought this was a good idea:
StaticAssertStmt(NAMEDATALEN <= MAX_LEVENSHTEIN_STRLEN,
"Levenshtein hinting mechanism restricts NAMEDATALEN");
is nuts.
A minimal fix that would not put s
