On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark writes:
>> Given this thread on pgsql-general I wonder if we should have
>> something like 1 in every 1,000 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS check if the
>> client socket is still open.
>
> ... and do what? If so, why?
Hm, an interesting questio
Greg Stark writes:
> Given this thread on pgsql-general I wonder if we should have
> something like 1 in every 1,000 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS check if the
> client socket is still open.
... and do what? If so, why?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
Given this thread on pgsql-general I wonder if we should have
something like 1 in every 1,000 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS check if the
client socket is still open.
This has come up in the past and the concern was that syscalls would
be way too slow to put in critical loops but perhaps if it's only done
o
