Re: [HACKERS] Function call with offset and limit

2005-12-22 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:18:22AM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:52:58AM +0100, REYNAUD Jean-Samuel wrote: > > Hi > > > > I've just tried it, and it works. So it's a good work-around. > > > > Though, is it a wanted feature to have a function being performed on

Re: [HACKERS] Function call with offset and limit

2005-12-22 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:52:58AM +0100, REYNAUD Jean-Samuel wrote: > Hi > > I've just tried it, and it works. So it's a good work-around. > > Though, is it a wanted feature to have a function being performed on > each row before the offset ? Well, saying offset 5000 pretty much means to calcul

Re: [HACKERS] Function call with offset and limit

2005-12-22 Thread REYNAUD Jean-Samuel
Hi I've just tried it, and it works. So it's a good work-around. Though, is it a wanted feature to have a function being performed on each row before the offset ? Le mercredi 21 décembre 2005 à 13:41 -0600, Jim C. Nasby a écrit : > Have you tried > > SELECT *, test_func(idkeyword) > FROM (

Re: [HACKERS] Function call with offset and limit

2005-12-21 Thread Jim C. Nasby
Have you tried SELECT *, test_func(idkeyword) FROM (SELECT * FROM tag OFFSET 5000 LIMIT 1) ; ? This should probably have been on -general, btw. On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:44:33PM +0100, REYNAUD Jean-Samuel wrote: > Hi all, > > We need to find a solution for a strange problem. > We have a

[HACKERS] Function call with offset and limit

2005-12-21 Thread REYNAUD Jean-Samuel
Hi all, We need to find a solution for a strange problem. We have a plpgsql FUNCTION which performs an heavy job (named test_func). CREATE or replace function test_func(z int) returns integer as $$ declare tst integer; begin -- -- Large jobs with z -- tst := nextval('test_truc'); return tst; e