Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just throwing out a crazy idea. What if we had a commitfest as
> > scheduled at the start of May but made it a Tom-free commitfest.
> > Specifically to try to organize a larger work-force rather than to
> > leave it all on Tom's should
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Better tools would be good, but unless someone commits to producing
> > a tool that will be ready by June but not by May, that's not a good
> > reason to slide either.
>
> Fine with me --- I just wanted to give T
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just throwing out a crazy idea. What if we had a commitfest as scheduled at
> the start of May but made it a Tom-free commitfest. Specifically to try to
> organize a larger work-force rather than to leave it all on Tom's shoulders.
> Not that your efforts
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
> >> off? And some time to improve the tools?
>
> > Agreed.
>
> I don't agree, not even a little bit. The reason this fest has been
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
>> off? And some time to improve the tools?
> Agreed.
I don't agree, not even a little bit. The reason this fest has been so
long and painful is that the
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
>> off? And some time to improve the tools?
>
> I would rather do the commit fests often, to keep the patch queue and the
> commit fests short.
Just
Chris Browne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heikki Linnakangas) writes:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some
time off? And some time to improve the tools?
I would rather do the commit fests often, to keep the patch queue and
the c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heikki Linnakangas) writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some
>> time off? And some time to improve the tools?
>
> I would rather do the commit fests often, to keep the patch queue and
> the commit fests short.
But if i
Josh Berkus wrote:
Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
off? And some time to improve the tools?
I would rather do the commit fests often, to keep the patch queue and
the commit fests short.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprised
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:31:51 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people
> > some time off? And some time to improve the tools?
>
> Agreed.
>
+1
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.comma
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > We are down to 12 feature freeze items (240 emails):
> >
> > http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> >
> > Most are not ready to apply but require feedback to the author.
>
> Yaaay!
>
> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
Bruce,
> We are down to 12 feature freeze items (240 emails):
>
> http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> Most are not ready to apply but require feedback to the author.
Yaaay!
Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
off? And some time to improve the too
We are down to 12 feature freeze items (240 emails):
http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
Most are not ready to apply but require feedback to the author.
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> We currently have processed 15 of the 40 patches in the patch queue
>> during our two months in feature freeze. Based on that progress, I
>> estimate we will enter beta in September.
> Based upo
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We currently have processed 15 of the 40 patches in the patch queue
> during our two months in feature freeze. Based on that progress, I
> estimate we will enter beta in September.
Based upon that, do we think 8.4 feature freeze will be o
We currently have processed 15 of the 40 patches in the patch queue
during our two months in feature freeze. Based on that progress, I
estimate we will enter beta in September.
While we have made progress on more than 15 patches, we also have left
many of the more complex patches to the end, so I
16 matches
Mail list logo
