> Actually,
>
> This reminds me of something I have been meaning to ask. All the new
> performance features are cool, but what I really need are all the ALTER
> TABLE ... functions implemented. In 7.0.x you could only add columns and
> foreign keys. You couldn't drop anything or add stuff like
CHECK
constraints. Has this situation changed for 7.1?
Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Burton
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2001 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Feature Request: ALTER FUNCTION (or something
Joel Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> . add a command like ALTER FUNCTION foo(text) TO foo(text) returns text as
>
This is on the TODO list already, I believe.
> This would seem to require that the new function would take the same
> parameters (and return the same?) as the old function.
(I know that everyone is focusing on 7.1. This is a question about how
hard it would be to plan a feature for 7.2 or later)
One of the small annoyances in PG is that I use many functions to handle
small details, and these functions are called by views. If I want to
improve a function, I have to
