Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-24 Thread Jim Nasby
On 2/24/17 10:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: On 02/24/2017 02:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: On 16 January 2017 at 05:01, Jim Nasby wrote: git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE Does this do anythng different from the git contrib script git-new-workdir that I have been using for

Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 02/24/2017 02:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: >> On 16 January 2017 at 05:01, Jim Nasby wrote: >>> git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE > Does this do anythng different from the git contrib script > git-new-workdir that I have been using for quite a long while? I think i

Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-24 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 02/24/2017 02:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 16 January 2017 at 05:01, Jim Nasby wrote: >> Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2], >> but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In >> short, if you're already in your checkout: >

Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-23 Thread Craig Ringer
On 16 January 2017 at 05:01, Jim Nasby wrote: > Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2], > but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In > short, if you're already in your checkout: > > git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE > > would

Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-23 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Bruce Momjian writes: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:47PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: >> Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2], >> but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In >> short, if you're already in your checkout: >> >> git

Re: [HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-02-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:47PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2], > but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In > short, if you're already in your checkout: > > git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STAB

[HACKERS] FYI: git worktrees as replacement for "rsync the CVSROOT"

2017-01-15 Thread Jim Nasby
Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2], but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In short, if you're already in your checkout: git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE would give you a checkout of 9.6 in the ../9.6 directory. BTW