- Цитат от Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com), на 25.06.2011 в 00:16 -
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote:
>> clients beta2 +fastlock +lazyvzid local socket
>> 8 76064 92430 92198 106734
>> 16 64254 90788 90698 105097
>> 32 56629 88189 88269 101202
>> 64 51124 84354 84639 96362
>>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote:
> clients beta2 +fastlock +lazyvzid local socket
> 8 76064 92430 92198 106734
> 16 64254 90788 90698 105097
> 32 56629 88189 88269 101202
> 64 51124 84354 84639 96362
> 128 45455 79361 79724 90625
> 256 40370 71904 72737 82434
I'm having trouble interpreti
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, wrote:
> I post this results because they somehow contradict with previous results
> posted on the list. In
> my case the patches does not only improve peak performance but also improve
> the performance
> under load - without patches the performance with 256 clie
Hello,
I have seen the discussions about fastlock patch and lazy-vxid performance
degradation, so I decided to test it myself.
The setup:
- hardware
Supermicro blade
6xSAS @15k on LSI RAID:
1 disk for system + pg_xlog
4 disk RAID 10 for data
1 disk for spare
2 x Xeon E5405 @2GHz (no HT)
