Joel,
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Joel Burton wrote:
> > > Sorry, but since I install all Cygwin packages plus about 30
> > > additional ones I haven't desire to determine what are the
> > > minimal requirements.
>
> If no one else has done this, I'll be happy to dig in and answer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestio
> > 1. Cygwin's setup.exe supports categories and dependencies.
> > Hence, there is no reason to install all Cygwin packages in
> > order to ensure properly PostgreSQL operation. Someone just
> > has to determine what is the minimal set of packages
> > necessary for PostgreSQL and I will update t
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwards:
> 4. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor performance. I have
> never done any benchmarks regarding this issue, but apparently Terry
> Carlin (from the defunct Great Bridge) did:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.p
Some comments from Jason Tishler the Cygwin-PostgreSQL maintainer...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 May 2002 15:00
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Would y
