Re: [HACKERS] FTI contrib

2001-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Plus, since it's is 100% backwards compatible with the version in 7.1.2, you > might want to back port it to the 7.1.* branch? Since we're hoping to go beta with 7.2 next week, I doubt there will be any further releases in the 7.1.* branch.

Re: [HACKERS] FTI contrib

2001-09-06 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Well, the FTI code that was committed works perfectly - it compiles fine against 7.0.3 and 7.1.2 and is in use indexing 2 columns in 2 row tables in two production and one test servers. The updated fti.pl we submitted still uses the PGConnect style functions, rather than the PG::Connect style

Re: [HACKERS] FTI contrib

2001-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has this been addressed? IIRC, I looked at the patch and decided it was okay. regards, tom lane >> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The latest patch we submitted to the fulltextindex module improved lots

Re: [HACKERS] FTI contrib

2001-08-06 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The latest patch we submitted to the fulltextindex module improved lots of > things but something we could not get to work was the apparently correct use > of the PG_GETARG* macros, etc. > Whenever we used these macros, we always got 0 or NU