On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:29:01 +0200,
Dennis Björklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
> filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
Currently this is the only way to use additional tables when doing a
>
> I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
> filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
>
> select foo.a;
>
> which I guess is transformed to
>
> select foo.a
> from foo;
>
> Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can
> Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can it be
> turned of? In my case it hid a bug and made my query work but produce the
> wrong result.
7.4 has a switch to turn this off for the same reasons you cite.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
select foo.a;
which I guess is transformed to
select foo.a
from foo;
Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can it be
turned of? In
