Re: [HACKERS] FDW oddity

2015-04-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 04/11/2015 07:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 04/11/2015 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: I have just noticed something slightly odd. The traces (obtained by setting client_min_messages to debug1) from the blackhole FDW show that the handler function is called each time an

Re: [HACKERS] FDW oddity

2015-04-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 04/11/2015 07:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 04/11/2015 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: I have just noticed something slightly odd. The traces (obtained by setting client_min_messages to debug1) from the blackhole FDW show that the handler function is called each time an

Re: [HACKERS] FDW oddity

2015-04-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 04/11/2015 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: I have just noticed something slightly odd. The traces (obtained by setting client_min_messages to debug1) from the blackhole FDW show that the handler function is called each time an INSERT is performed. This is not the case for S

Re: [HACKERS] FDW oddity

2015-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > I have just noticed something slightly odd. The traces (obtained by > setting client_min_messages to debug1) from the blackhole FDW show that > the handler function is called each time an INSERT is performed. This is > not the case for SELECT, UPDATE or DELETE. It looks

[HACKERS] FDW oddity

2015-04-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I have just noticed something slightly odd. The traces (obtained by setting client_min_messages to debug1) from the blackhole FDW show that the handler function is called each time an INSERT is performed. This is not the case for SELECT, UPDATE or DELETE. It looks at first glance like a buglet.