"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
>> from what it used to do.
> I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> in the protocol section,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
> >> from what it used to do.
>
> > I think it would be useful to have
On 1-Nov-06, at 6:18 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are logs from Beta 2.
With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different
behavior
from what it used to do.
I think it would be useful
On 31-Oct-06, at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are logs from Beta 2.
With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different
behavior
from what it used to do.
to be honest I don't know, and looking at the logs I suspect that
this is jus
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > These are logs from Beta 2.
>
> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
> from what it used to do.
I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test progra
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are logs from Beta 2.
With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
from what it used to do.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't '
These are logs from Beta 2.
Did I miss a discussion where we removed the name of the portal
during parse, and bind ?
5715%2006-11-01 01:02:26.631 PST%454862a0.1653%SELECT LOG: execute
S_2: select t0.c_id, t0.c_contact, t0.c_credit_limit, t0.c_state,
t0.c_zip, t0.c_phone, t0.c_credit, t0.
