On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:41:45PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Here,
>
> I talked to my supervisor here in Toronto (that's where I am this week)
> and Afilias actually sees enough value in this for me to go and spend
> time officially on it.
Yay!
> The ideas I have so far are as follows:
>
> Do
On 7/8/2008 11:38 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
SQL, in text form, is the interface to other databases. You can't
pass half a plan tree to Oracle, especially not a PostgreSQL plan
tree. It has to be text if you wis
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> SQL, in text form, is the interface to other databases. You can't
>> pass half a plan tree to Oracle, especially not a PostgreSQL plan
>> tree. It has to be text if you wish to send a query to another
>> RDB
Simon Riggs wrote:
SQL, in text form, is the interface to other databases. You can't pass
half a plan tree to Oracle, especially not a PostgreSQL plan tree. It
has to be text if you wish to send a query to another RDBMS, or another
version of PostgreSQL.
Oh, I see. Agreed.
Though note that the
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 17:51 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > The notes say "Heikki doesn't think this is a long term solution", but
> > in the following discussion it was the *only* way of doing this that
> > will work with non-PostgreSQL databases. So it seems like the wa
Simon Riggs wrote:
The notes say "Heikki doesn't think this is a long term solution", but
in the following discussion it was the *only* way of doing this that
will work with non-PostgreSQL databases. So it seems like the way we
would want to go, yes?
How did you come to the conclusion that this
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:26 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:46:29PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
For the record, I agree with Jan's suggestion of passing a pointer
to the parse tree, and offline gave David a suggestion verbally as
to how this cou
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:26 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:46:29PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > >
> > For the record, I agree with Jan's suggestion of passing a pointer
> > to the parse tree, and offline gave David a suggestion verbally as
> > to how this could be hand
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:46:29PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> >> Please find attached the patch, and thanks to Neil Conway and
> >> Korry Douglas for the code, and to Jan Wieck for helping me
> >> hammer out the scheme above. M
>
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>
>> Please find attached the patch, and thanks to Neil Conway and Korry
>> Douglas for the code, and to Jan Wieck for helping me hammer out the
>> scheme above. Mistakes are all mine ;)
>
> I see no negative comments to this patch on -hac
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Please find attached the patch, and thanks to Neil Conway and Korry
> Douglas for the code, and to Jan Wieck for helping me hammer out the
> scheme above. Mistakes are all mine ;)
I see no negative comments to this patch on -hackers.
Thi
Folks,
I'd like to make it possible to see qualifiers from inside functions
in PostgreSQL. For my particular case, and for dblink, it would
allow user-space code to some remove bottlenecks which make currently
make inter-DBMS communication extremely inefficient.
The current code returns one (pot
12 matches
Mail list logo
