On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 00:38:10 -0400,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I stuck a finger into the dike, but I think some people need to
> reconsider just how far they want to push "Informix compatibility".
> "#define date long" is certain to break and keep breaking our code,
> and doubtl
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get the following compiler error messages when doing a make on current CVS:
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> -I../../../../src/interfaces/ecpg/include -I../../../../src/include/utils
> -I../../../../src/include -
I get the following compiler error messages when doing a make on current CVS:
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
-I../../../../src/interfaces/ecpg/include -I../../../../src/include/utils
-I../../../../src/include -g -c timestamp.c -o timestamp.o
timestamp.c: In fun