Re: [HACKERS] Error arguments in pl_exec.c

2008-11-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Attached patch seems right to me - objections? > > Good catch. What gave you these warnings exactly? Same here - the new version of gcc. Will go ahead and apply. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@p

Re: [HACKERS] Error arguments in pl_exec.c

2008-11-20 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Attached patch seems right to me - objections? Good catch. What gave you these warnings exactly? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: h

Re: [HACKERS] Error arguments in pl_exec.c

2008-11-20 Thread Gregory Stark
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I get the following warnings in HEAD > > pl_exec.c: In function ‘exec_stmt_raise’: > pl_exec.c:2538: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > pl_exec.c:2538: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > > > Attac

[HACKERS] Error arguments in pl_exec.c

2008-11-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
I get the following warnings in HEAD pl_exec.c: In function ‘exec_stmt_raise’: pl_exec.c:2538: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments pl_exec.c:2538: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments Attached patch seems right to me - objections? //Magnus Index: