Kevin Grittner wrote:
> New patch attached.
Pushed (to master only).
277607d600fb71e25082b94302ca1716403cd0bc
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to yo
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't attribute_used() be removed from rewriteManip.h?
Yeah, I don't know how I missed that. Thanks.
> I was a bit surprised by your removal of the
> rangeTableEntry_used() test in the hunk at
> rewriteHandler.c:1273ff. That's probably all right, but it takes
> this out
Kevin Grittner writes:
> Unless someone has an objection or thinks this needs to go through
> the CF process, I will commit it tomorrow, with a catversion bump.
Shouldn't attribute_used() be removed from rewriteManip.h?
I was a bit surprised by your removal of the rangeTableEntry_used()
test in
This was previously discussed here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/24836.1370713...@sss.pgh.pa.us#24836.1370713...@sss.pgh.pa.us
The attached patch implements what I think we agreed on.
To recap, ev_attr was present in pg_rewrite at the point that
Postgres95 version 1.01 source code w
Is this transformation correct? If I read this correctly, you're
missing the rangeTableEntry_used() condition, no?
> *** a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> --- b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> ***
> *** 1273,1287 matchLocks(CmdType event,
> }
