Robert Haas escribió:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I still think a better option to that would be to get psql to provide
> > a link to the full documentation there.
>
> It seems like clutter to me, but I'll defer to whatever the consensus is.
I second the idea of
On 07/01/2013 07:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
there an equivalent we could #ifdef in
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> How different are they really? Yes, they are very different from an
> implementation standpoint, from an enduser perspective they really are
> not. If they were, they'd probably be called something else.
They're different because they consu
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> With deepest respect, failing to provide documentation to users on our
>> widest-deployed platform seems pretty hostile to me.
>
> Yes, that would be pretty hostile. However, we don't do
On 07/01/2013 03:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Regardless of whether you agree with or disagree with the above
statement, building a high-quality documentation reader into psql so
that users who are running Windows but not mingw, cygwin, or pgAdmin
can access the documentation more easily doesn't se
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> With deepest respect, failing to provide documentation to users on our
> widest-deployed platform seems pretty hostile to me.
Yes, that would be pretty hostile. However, we don't do anything that
remotely resembles that statement, nor has an
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:52:55AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> You can run \! man from within psql,
> >>> And if you're on Windows,
On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
>>> And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
>>> there an equivalent we could #if
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> >> You can run \! man from within psql,
> > And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
> > there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for that platform?
>
> If you are u
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> You can run \! man from within psql,
> And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
> there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for that platform?
If you are using psql on Windows extensively, you probably have one of
mingw, cygwin, or p
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:34:17PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/28/13 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander escribió:
> >
> >> They are already crosslinked under "see also". But that doesn't
> >> really help the guy doing "\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the
> >> case whe
Peter Eisentraut escribió:
> On 6/28/13 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander escribió:
> >
> >> They are already crosslinked under "see also". But that doesn't really
> >> help the guy doing "\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the case where
> >> it was brought to my attention.
> >
On 6/28/13 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Magnus Hagander escribió:
>
>> They are already crosslinked under "see also". But that doesn't really
>> help the guy doing "\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the case where
>> it was brought to my attention.
>
> Maybe \h should somehow display the "s
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Magnus Hagander escribió:
>
>> They are already crosslinked under "see also". But that doesn't really
>> help the guy doing "\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the case where
>> it was brought to my attention.
>
> Maybe \h should somehow dis
Magnus Hagander escribió:
> They are already crosslinked under "see also". But that doesn't really
> help the guy doing "\h CREATE VIEW" in psql, which was the case where
> it was brought to my attention.
Maybe \h should somehow display the "see also" section?
--
Álvaro Herrerah
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
The functionality of materialized views will (over time) totally swamp
that of normal views, so mixing all the corresponding documentation
with the documentation for normal v
Robert Haas wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> The functionality of materialized views will (over time) totally swamp
>>> that of normal views, so mixing all the corresponding documentation
>>> with the documentation for normal views probably doesn’t make things
>>> easier for people that a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> The functionality of materialized views will (over time) totally swamp
>> that of normal views, so mixing all the corresponding documentation
>> with the documentation for normal views probably doesn’t make things
>> easier for people that
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Nicolas Barbier
wrote:
> 2013/6/27 Magnus Hagander :
>
>> Is there a particular reason why CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW is part of the
>> help for CREATE VIEW, but CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW doesn't show up
>> there?
>>
>> I realize the technical reason (they're different
2013/6/27 Magnus Hagander :
> Is there a particular reason why CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW is part of the
> help for CREATE VIEW, but CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW doesn't show up
> there?
>
> I realize the technical reason (they're different man pages, and that
> also controls what's in \h in psql which is
Is there a particular reason why CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW is part of the
help for CREATE VIEW, but CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW doesn't show up
there?
I realize the technical reason (they're different man pages, and that
also controls what's in \h in psql which is where I ran into it), but
was there any
21 matches
Mail list logo
