Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-12-10 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/08/2012 11:55:19 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > On 11/08/2012 11:10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > > Ah, well, as to that, I think you'd have to take that suggestion to > > pgsql-www. The style sheets used for the web site are - just to > make > > things exciting - stored in a completely different

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/6/12 12:09 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > -- > On 11/06/2012 10:41:04 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote: >> > On 11/06/2012 11:27 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > I'm trying to improve a table of PostgreSQL error codes >>> > > in the PostgreSQL

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-08 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/08/2012 11:10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > In your generated output I see: > > > > > > Class 00 — > > Successful Completion > > > > > > It's just matter of CSS rule like > > > > td .EMPHASIS { font-size: 14

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > In your generated output I see: > > > Class 00 — > Successful Completion > > > It's just matter of CSS rule like > > td .EMPHASIS { font-size: 140%; } > > to make such labels more visible. > --

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/06/2012 01:40:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Frankly, I don't view this as enough of a problem to be worth > spending > time on. Actually, I'm not sure I view the formatting of that table > as a problem at all, but if it is a problem it's not a big enough one > to justify knocking ourselves o

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/06/2012 01:40:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > So at this point I'm out of ideas. Unless somebody > > can chime in with a clue I'm ready to give up. > > Frankly, I don't view this as enough of a problem to be worth > spending > time on.

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > So at this point I'm out of ideas. Unless somebody > can chime in with a clue I'm ready to give up. Frankly, I don't view this as enough of a problem to be worth spending time on. Actually, I'm not sure I view the formatting of that table a

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Note: This email is not immediately relevant to Postgres, although someday it may be. On 11/06/2012 11:38:07 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 11/06/2012 12:09 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > >> > >>> Postgresql uses Docbook 4.2 and openjade/dsssl style sheets. > I don't recall what the arguments again

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 11/06/2012 12:09 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: Postgresql uses Docbook 4.2 and openjade/dsssl style sheets. Is there even a remote chance for you to migrate to XSL stylesheets ? I'm not sure the DSSL ones are maintained at all at this point, so improvements, fixes, and customizations are much ea

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-06 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/05/2012 09:41:13 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > The attached patch, errorcode_table_v2.patch, is an attempt to > do it the right way. Since I'm stuck I asked about this patch on the docbook-apps mailing list. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/201211/msg00027.html I got the f

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-05 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/05/2012 02:40:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Karl O. Pinc > wrote: > >> This patch adds an empty row before each section header > >> in the error codes table in the docs. > > > This doesn't seem like a particularly good idea to me, but w

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >>> This patch adds an empty row before each section header >>> in the error codes table in the docs. > >> This doesn't seem like a particularly good idea to me, but wha

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >> This patch adds an empty row before each section header >> in the error codes table in the docs. > This doesn't seem like a particularly good idea to me, but what do > other people think? It seems like a kluge. If t

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-11-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > This patch adds an empty row before each section header > in the error codes table in the docs. > > I tried not putting an empty row before the first > section, but it looks better to always have > an empty row. IMO. > > File: errorcode_tabl

[HACKERS] Doc patch, distinguish sections with an empty row in error code table

2012-10-26 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Hi, This patch adds an empty row before each section header in the error codes table in the docs. I tried not putting an empty row before the first section, but it looks better to always have an empty row. IMO. File: errorcode_table.patch Applies against head. Regards, Karl Free Software: