Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> > I certainly would like to see Dllist removed too.
> >
> > > This mean that is waste of time work on dllist.
> > > I seen that exist a TODO list about "features",
> > > exist a list about: "code to op
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> I certainly would like to see Dllist removed too.
>
> > This mean that is waste of time work on dllist.
> > I seen that exist a TODO list about "features",
> > exist a list about: "code to optimize" ?
>
> What TODO item where y
Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm improving the Dllist in these direction:
> >
> > AFAIR, catcache.c is the *only* remaining backend customer for Dllist,
> > and so any improvement for Dllist that breaks catcac
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm improving the Dllist in these direction:
>
> AFAIR, catcache.c is the *only* remaining backend customer for Dllist,
> and so any improvement for Dllist that breaks catcache is hardly an
> improvement, no?
"Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm improving the Dllist in these direction:
AFAIR, catcache.c is the *only* remaining backend customer for Dllist,
and so any improvement for Dllist that breaks catcache is hardly an
improvement, no?
> 1) Avoid "if" statements in insertion/remove p
I'm improving the Dllist in these direction:
1) Avoid "if" statements in insertion/remove phase, for instance now the
AddHeader appear like this:
void
DLAddHead(Dllist *l, Dlelem *e)
{
Dlelem *where = l->dll_master_node->dle_next;
e->dle_next = where;
e->dle_prev = where->dle_prev;
w
