On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, not sure what I was thinking --- strftime() is the way to go. Here
> is the new output:
>
> ;
> ; Archive created at 2014-09-04 13:00:15 -0400 <---
> ; dbname: test
> ; TOC Entries: 8
> ;
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 08:33:31PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I can't seem to find a way to get the timezone offset via C; see:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/635780/why-does-glibc-timezone-global-not-agree-with-system-time-on-dst
>
> On Linux, do 'man timezone' for details.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:02:19PM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> I would prefer the date in a sane numeric format to the left of the
> time (similar to what I suggested above), easier to sort (if a sort
> is required) - it is also easier to use regular expressions to
> select statement in an arbitra
On 04/09/14 08:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:09:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:33:51PM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 01/05/14 12:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 08:27:49AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce M
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:09:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:33:51PM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > On 01/05/14 12:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 08:27:49AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > >>On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >>>The tabl
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:33:51PM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 01/05/14 12:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 08:27:49AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> >>On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>The table of contents for pg_restore -l shows the time the archive was
> >>>made
On 01/05/14 12:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 08:27:49AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The table of contents for pg_restore -l shows the time the archive was
made as local time (it uses ctime()):
; Archive created at Wed Apr 30 10:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 08:27:49AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >The table of contents for pg_restore -l shows the time the archive was
> >made as local time (it uses ctime()):
> >
> > ; Archive created at Wed Apr 30 10:03:28 2014
> >
> >Is this clear e
On 01/05/14 02:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The table of contents for pg_restore -l shows the time the archive was
made as local time (it uses ctime()):
; Archive created at Wed Apr 30 10:03:28 2014
Is this clear enough that it is local time? Should we display this
better, perhaps with a t
The table of contents for pg_restore -l shows the time the archive was
made as local time (it uses ctime()):
; Archive created at Wed Apr 30 10:03:28 2014
Is this clear enough that it is local time? Should we display this
better, perhaps with a time zone designation?
--
Bruce Momjian
10 matches
Mail list logo
