On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> I don't have a problem with that. It would probably work, too, since FROM
> is already fully reserved.
Marking patch as returned with feedback as there has been no input
from Marko in the last couple of weeks.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgs
On 12/17/14 5:37 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12/15/2014 02:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
The syntax is:
DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY role [, ...]
DROP seems like the wrong verb here. DROP is used for deleting objects,
while REVOKE is used for removing permissions from them. REVOKE alread
On 12/15/2014 02:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
This week I had a problem where I wanted to drop only the privileges a
certain role had in the system, while keeping all the objects. I
couldn't figure out a reasonable way to do that, so I've attached a
patch for this to this email. Please consider
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This week I had a problem where I wanted to drop only the privileges a
> certain role had in the system, while keeping all the objects. I couldn't
> figure out a reasonable way to do that, so I've attached a patch for this to
> this
Hi,
This week I had a problem where I wanted to drop only the privileges a
certain role had in the system, while keeping all the objects. I
couldn't figure out a reasonable way to do that, so I've attached a
patch for this to this email. Please consider it for inclusion into
9.5. The synta
