>> I haven't yet heard any very good argument for deviating from our
>> past practice, which is to credit just the principal author(s)
>> of each patch, not reviewers.
>
> Is that what people want? Reviewers are easily removed. What about
> committers who adjust the patch?
Well, I still think
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I haven't yet heard any very good argument for deviating from our
>> past practice, which is to credit just the principal author(s)
>> of each patch, not reviewers.
>
> Is that what people want? Reviewers are easily removed.
+1 from me.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:59:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:27:21PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> We seem to be in danger of overthinking this.
>
> > Results have just shown it isn't a simple case. It is unclear how
> > important the revie
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:27:21PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> We seem to be in danger of overthinking this.
> Results have just shown it isn't a simple case. It is unclear how
> important the reviewers were, and how much a committer rewrote the
> patch, and the signi
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:27:21PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Should we go with a single developer per item, and then let people
> >suggest corrections? With reviewers involved, and often multiple commit
> >messages per release note item, the just isn't enough detail in git logs
> >to reprodu
On 05/12/2012 09:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:42:48PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
How many names on a single item is ideal? The activity of reviewers and
their names on commit messages has greatly expanded the number of
potential names per item.
How much of a downside
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:42:48PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > How many names on a single item is ideal? The activity of reviewers and
> > their names on commit messages has greatly expanded the number of
> > potential names per item.
> >
> > How much of a downside is having the names in the
> How many names on a single item is ideal? The activity of reviewers and
> their names on commit messages has greatly expanded the number of
> potential names per item.
>
> How much of a downside is having the names in the release notes? For
> example, we decided that company names shouldn't b
