Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

2017-09-06 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 06 Sep 2017, at 02:56, Amit Langote wrote: > > On 2017/09/05 21:14, Tom Lane wrote: >> Amit Langote writes: >>> On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote: Here is the copyright in partition.h: * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group I think

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

2017-09-05 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/09/05 21:14, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote writes: >> On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >>> Here is the copyright in partition.h: >>> >>>  * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group >>> >>> I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c,

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

2017-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Amit Langote writes: > On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> Here is the copyright in partition.h: >> >>  * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group >> >> I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c, >> but partition.c has: >> >>  * Portions

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

2017-09-05 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Here is the copyright in partition.h: > >  * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group > > I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c, > but partition.c has: > >  * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, Postgr

[HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c

2017-09-04 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Here is the copyright in partition.h: * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c, but partition.c has: * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group * Portions Copyright (c)