> Robert Haas writes:
> > Tom, do you want to review this patch and figure out how to solve the
> > underlying problem? If not, I will take care of it. But I will be
> > unhappy if I put time and effort into this and then you insist on
> > changing everything afterwards, again.
>
> [ sorry for
ackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Construction of Plan-node by CSP (RE:
> Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
>
> Robert Haas writes:
> > Tom, do you want to review this patch and figure out how to solve the
> > underlying problem? If not, I will take care of it. But I
Robert Haas writes:
> Tom, do you want to review this patch and figure out how to solve the
> underlying problem? If not, I will take care of it. But I will be
> unhappy if I put time and effort into this and then you insist on
> changing everything afterwards, again.
[ sorry for slow response,
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> I updated the patch to fix up this problem towards the latest master
> branch.
[ ... ]
> Instead of this approach, Tom suggested to add a list of child Paths
> on CustomPath node, then createplan.c calls create_plan_recurse() for
> each entry
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 8:44 AM
> To: 'Tom Lane'; Kohei KaiGai
> Cc: Robert Haas; Thom Brown; Shigeru Hanada; pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: RE: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [HACKERS] [v9.5] Custom Plan API)
>
> > A possible compromise that we could perh
