A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans-Jürgen
Schönig) wrote:
> I think it is important not to think in dogmas (in this case this
> means SQL syntax is always better) - there should be a reasonable
> compromise between compatibility and standard.
> My compromise would
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
My compromise would be: Support both syntaxes if possible.
Great... code away. I would suggest a:
oracle_compat = true/false in the postgresql.conf
Yes I am kidding. The differences between Oracle and PostgreSQL
for mo
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>> My compromise would be: Support both syntaxes if possible.
> I can see your point, but imagine if we had Oracle compatibility for
> lots of cases --- our system would have either non-standard or duplicate
> ways of doing things, and that would
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> >> Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by
> >> oracle and the latter by db2 (iirc)
> >
> >
> > I think the past consensus has been to adopt the SQL standard syntax. Is
> > there any rea
Neil Conway wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by
oracle and the latter by db2 (iirc)
I think the past consensus has been to adopt the SQL standard syntax. Is
there any reason to also support the Oracle syntax other than for
compatibili
Robert Treat wrote:
Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by oracle
and the latter by db2 (iirc)
I think the past consensus has been to adopt the SQL standard syntax. Is
there any reason to also support the Oracle syntax other than for
compatibility? (And if that is
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I notice the CONNECT BY patch has been updated for 8.0:
> >
> > http://gppl.moonbone.ru/
> >
> > Seriously, we really need to get this into 8.1. Convert it to the
> > standard WITH RECURSIVE syntax if ne
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I notice the CONNECT BY patch has been updated for 8.0:
>
> http://gppl.moonbone.ru/
>
> Seriously, we really need to get this into 8.1. Convert it to the
> standard WITH RECURSIVE syntax if necessary...
Yep, we are just waiting for someone to do the work.
--
I notice the CONNECT BY patch has been updated for 8.0:
http://gppl.moonbone.ru/
Seriously, we really need to get this into 8.1. Convert it to the
standard WITH RECURSIVE syntax if necessary...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searche
