On 2016/11/03 23:39, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
A larger issue is that I think the API itself is poorly designed, as
I stated awhile ago (<31706.1457547...@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
I agree on that point. I plan to rewrite direct modify using upper
planner pat
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> I'm not interested in committing this patch. I don't believe it is an
>> improvement on what we've got today.
>> Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?
>
> I have no objection to this patch as such, but I think that t
Robert Haas writes:
> I'm not interested in committing this patch. I don't believe it is an
> improvement on what we've got today.
> Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?
I have no objection to this patch as such, but I think that the docs
around FDW direct modify need significantly more w
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Rushabh Lathia
> wrote:
>> I performed basic test with patch,
>>
>> a) patch get applied cleanly on latest source,
>> b) able to build documentation cleanly.
>>
>> Marking this as ready for committer.
>
> O
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Rushabh Lathia
wrote:
> I performed basic test with patch,
>
> a) patch get applied cleanly on latest source,
> b) able to build documentation cleanly.
>
> Marking this as ready for committer.
Oops, incorrect patch... I am moving it to next CF. Discussion can
cont
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the comments!
>
> On 2016/09/02 11:55, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Etsuro Fujita
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that the following note about direct modification via
>>> GetForeignUpperPaths
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the comments!
On 2016/09/02 11:55, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
I noticed that the following note about direct modification via
GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml is a bit confusing. We have another
approach using PlanDire
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> I noticed that the following note about direct modification via
> GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml is a bit confusing. We have another
> approach using PlanDirectModify, so that should be reflected in the note as
> well. Please find a
On 2016/08/01 21:14, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I noticed that the following note about direct modification via
GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml is a bit confusing. We have
another approach using PlanDirectModify, so that should be reflected in
the note as well. Please find attached a patch.
Hi,
I noticed that the following note about direct modification via
GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml is a bit confusing. We have
another approach using PlanDirectModify, so that should be reflected in
the note as well. Please find attached a patch.
PlanForeignModify and the
10 matches
Mail list logo
