On 2015-03-04 08:41:23 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Couldn't we just arbitrarily exclude sequence internal states from the
> comparison?
Not sure what you mean? You mean just not dump them? I guess we could by
editing the contents of a custom format dump? A bit annoying to have a
script doing that..
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've regularly wished we had automated tests that setup HS and then
> compare primary/standby at the end to verify replay worked
> correctly.
>
> Heikki's page comparison tools deals with some of that verification, but
> it's really q
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I every now and then run installcheck against a primary, verify that
> replay works without errors, and then compare pg_dumpall from both
> clusters. Unfortunately that currently requires hand inspection of
> dumps, there are differences like
On 03/03/2015 07:49 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd very much like to add a automated test like this to the tree, but I
> don't see wa way to do that sanely without a comparison tool...
We could use a comparison tool anyway. Baron Schwartz was pointing out
that Percona has a comparison tool for My
Hi,
I've regularly wished we had automated tests that setup HS and then
compare primary/standby at the end to verify replay worked
correctly.
Heikki's page comparison tools deals with some of that verification, but
it's really quite expensive and doesn't care about runtime only
differences. I.e.
