On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:15 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2008-07-08 13:50:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I can tell you from the perspective of CF coordinator, it's a PITA.
> >
> > I felt so too at first, but I'm comfortable with it now.
>
> Then I'm in awe of your wiki-edit
At 2008-07-08 13:50:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I can tell you from the perspective of CF coordinator, it's a PITA.
>
> I felt so too at first, but I'm comfortable with it now.
Then I'm in awe of your wiki-editing skills. After keeping at it for a
few days, I've given up trying to do
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
>> I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by "current commitfest".
>> We probably need two separate terms for
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
> I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by "current commitfest".
> We probably need two separate terms for "the place to submit new
> patches" and "th
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 21:56:34 Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Right now you advance the static link to the next commit fest once the
>> current one starts --- I was hoping for a link that advances when the
>> commit fest is done so I could make it a permanent ta
On Monday 07 July 2008 21:56:34 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points
> > > to the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the comm
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be very useful if people would add a comment like "started my
> review of X now". Otherwise people don't know whether the reviewer is
> actually reviewing it at length, or just intend to at some point.
That's a good idea, imho, I'll try to do t
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:03 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Brendan,
>
> > What I'm saying is, I've got the opportunity and the inclination to
> > make the wiki more usable. If you guys want better navigation,
> > there's a suggestion on the table to improve that. I'm not too
> > worried about the
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
>> people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
>>
>> To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defi
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points to
> > the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the commit fest of
> > _over_.
> >
>
> Well, most of the time th
"Jaime Casanova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
>> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
>> email to the list, and add your patch to the
On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
> email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
> sound right
Brendan,
What I'm saying is, I've got the opportunity and the inclination to
make the wiki more usable. If you guys want better navigation,
there's a suggestion on the table to improve that. I'm not too
worried about the wiki eventually being ditched for something better
-- in fact I'm looking
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm. I thought that commitfest-by-wiki was something that we were only
> doing until we had the technical requirements for tracking commitfests
> nailed down, and then we were going to write a PHP app. No?
>
That sounds go
Dave Page wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the concept - specifically, no new patches once the
fest beg
Brendan, all:
I mentioned to Alvaro over IM that I was thinking about adding a
navigation bar at the bottom of each commitfest. This would show,
e.g., for the current July commitfest:
Hmmm. I thought that commitfest-by-wiki was something that we were only
doing until we had the technical re
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points to
> the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the commit fest of
> _over_.
>
Well, most of the time there isn't any commitfest "in-progres
Dave Page wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
> >> recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
> >> develope
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
>> recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
>> developer page (http://wiki.postgre
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
> recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
> developer page (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information) it
> has a link to the "current
On Saturday 05 July 2008 18:07:46 Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 15:12:08 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 7/3/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Thursday 03 July 2008 18:16:38 Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
> >> that you are bumped from the fest?
> >
> > No, if
On Thursday 03 July 2008 15:12:08 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/3/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the Ju
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
>> that you are bumped from the fest?
>
> No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
> that you are bumped from the fest?
No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step
is to get it added to the fest page; I don't think that should be
controver
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
>> 29, 2008 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
> 29, 2008 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
> re-posted the Jun 30th and then an updated patch today... It only
> bei
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
> people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
>
> To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
> we came up with
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
> people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
>
> To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
> we came up with t
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/3/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
> >> people are still being advised to add new
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/3/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
>> people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
>>
>> To make the idea work, we need
On 7/3/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
> people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
>
> To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
> we came up with the concept - speci
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the concept - specifically, no new patches once the
fest begins!
So please - n
33 matches
Mail list logo
