It's time for another one of these again. We're now just past the
nominal 1 month goal of each CommitFest, and as you can obviously see
from my list traffic I'm trying to close things up.
One of the CF goals is to give everyone who submits something a fair
review. There are a few patches tha
On 15 December 2011 19:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that the tuplesort comparison overhead
> reduction is in Peter G's hands to rebase at the moment; I will look
> at that again when it reemerges.
Yes, sorry about that - I was a little bit sidetracked by something
else. I'll work on it tomorr
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> There's a normal sized plate lined up for Robert since he's been keeping up
> better; in no particular order:
>
> -More review on the always a new surprise "Fix Leaky Views Problem, again"
> -Extra fun with "Tuplesort comparison overhead reducti
All of the information on the CommitFest app is as accurate as I could
make it now, I made a pass over every open thread there to look for
major changes that hadn't gotten message ID archive links. Since the
official start 13 patches have been committed and 6 bounced out.
Reminder notes have
