Re: [HACKERS] Comments on system tables and columns

2011-05-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of lun mar 28 08:14:07 -0300 2011: > > Hi, > > > > I notice that none of the system tables or columns thereof bear any > > comments. Is this intentional, or an oversight? I would have thought > > comments would be useful since the column

Re: [HACKERS] Comments on system tables and columns

2011-03-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of lun mar 28 08:14:07 -0300 2011: > Hi, > > I notice that none of the system tables or columns thereof bear any > comments. Is this intentional, or an oversight? I would have thought > comments would be useful since the column names aren't exactly always > sel

Re: [HACKERS] Comments on system tables and columns

2011-03-28 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Em 28-03-2011 08:14, Thom Brown escreveu: I notice that none of the system tables or columns thereof bear any comments. Is this intentional, or an oversight? I would have thought comments would be useful since the column names aren't exactly always self-explanatory. It could be useful in some

[HACKERS] Comments on system tables and columns

2011-03-28 Thread Thom Brown
Hi, I notice that none of the system tables or columns thereof bear any comments. Is this intentional, or an oversight? I would have thought comments would be useful since the column names aren't exactly always self-explanatory. Thanks -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ix