Re: [HACKERS] Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c

2014-03-31 Thread Amit Langote
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Amit Langote > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Note the following comment in >> src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap() >> >> 1088 /* If no indexes, make log report that lazy_vacuum_heap >> would've made

Re: [HACKERS] Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c

2014-03-31 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Amit Langote wrote: > Hi, > > Note the following comment in > src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap() > > 1088 /* If no indexes, make log report that lazy_vacuum_heap > would've made */ > 1089 if (vacuumed_pages) > 1090 ereport(elevel,

[HACKERS] Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c

2014-03-24 Thread Amit Langote
Hi, Note the following comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap() 1088 /* If no indexes, make log report that lazy_vacuum_heap would've made */ 1089 if (vacuumed_pages) 1090 ereport(elevel, Just wondering if it would read better as: 1088 /* Make the log re