"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When we checkpoint we write out all dirty buffers. But ISTM we don't really
>> need to write out buffers which are dirty but which have an LSN older than
>> the
>> previous checkpoint. Those represent buffers wh
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When we checkpoint we write out all dirty buffers. But ISTM we don't really
> need to write out buffers which are dirty but which have an LSN older than the
> previous checkpoint. Those represent buffers which were dirtied by a
> non-wal-logged modificati
When we checkpoint we write out all dirty buffers. But ISTM we don't really
need to write out buffers which are dirty but which have an LSN older than the
previous checkpoint. Those represent buffers which were dirtied by a
non-wal-logged modification, ie, hint bit setting. The other non-wal-logge
