On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 00:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 24 19:19:10 -0300 2012:
>>> In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
>>> child process before we check any of the pg_hba.conf file. Now, I
>>>
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 24 19:19:10 -0300 2012:
>> In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
>> child process before we check any of the pg_hba.conf file. Now, I
>> realize we can't do authentication in the postmaster b
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 07:27:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 24 19:19:10 -0300 2012:
> > In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
> > child process before we check any of the pg_hba.conf file. Now, I
> > realize
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 24 19:19:10 -0300 2012:
> In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
> child process before we check any of the pg_hba.conf file. Now, I
> realize we can't do authentication in the postmaster because of possible
> delay,
In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
child process before we check any of the pg_hba.conf file. Now, I
realize we can't do authentication in the postmaster because of possible
delay, and checking the user name and database name filters is just work
that is better d
