Re: [HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-15 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 05/15/2015 10:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: 1. File System Level Backup The section should be a note within the larger document. It is largely a legacy section from before 8.3. I agree. I think this section is just plain weird at th

Re: [HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > 1. File System Level Backup > > The section should be a note within the larger document. It is largely a > legacy section from before 8.3. I agree. I think this section is just plain weird at this point. Most people would assume that yo

Re: [HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:15:51AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > > On 05/15/2015 07:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >>3. Push the rsync paragraph (and edit where appropriate) within the > >>continuous archiving section. > >> > >>3a. Add information about robocopy (windows rsync) > > > >Oh, yes

Re: [HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-15 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 05/15/2015 07:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: 3. Push the rsync paragraph (and edit where appropriate) within the continuous archiving section. 3a. Add information about robocopy (windows rsync) Oh, yes, we should mention robocopy. I had never heard of that. 4. Move continuous arch

Re: [HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:53:01AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > > -hackers, > > After my brain flatulence last week on backups, I decided to read > the docs again. There are some improvements that I would like to > make and wanted some feedback: > > 1. File System Level Backup > > The section s

[HACKERS] Changes to backup.sgml

2015-05-14 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-hackers, After my brain flatulence last week on backups, I decided to read the docs again. There are some improvements that I would like to make and wanted some feedback: 1. File System Level Backup The section should be a note within the larger document. It is largely a legacy section fr