> Can we come to some kind of decision on this before going beta?
>> The point of these changelogs was to show the changes between beta and rc
>> versions, because those were not necessarily recorded in the HISTORY file.
>> However, putting these in the tarball is questionable (if you already
>>
> I'd suggest that the future procedure ought to be to pull a changelog
> from CVS but put it beside the tarball on the FTP server, not inside
> the tarball (and certainly not back into CVS --- that's redundant).
When we commit the log files to CVS, don't we have to run cvs log again
and commit a
Can we come to some kind of decision on this before going beta?
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Can I ask why we are mentioning the changelog for the release and not
> > the list from the HISTORY file? Any why are we putting the changelog in
> > the tarball anyway? Seems that could easily go o
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Can I ask why we are mentioning the changelog for the release and not
> the list from the HISTORY file? Any why are we putting the changelog in
> the tarball anyway? Seems that could easily go on a web site.
The point of these changelogs was to show the changes between
Can I ask why we are mentioning the changelog for the release and not
the list from the HISTORY file? Any why are we putting the changelog in
the tarball anyway? Seems that could easily go on a web site.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
