Re: [HACKERS] Case preserving - suggestions

2004-06-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Shachar Shemesh wrote: Robert Treat wrote: On Sunday 06 June 2004 13:47, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Hi list, A postgresql migration I am doing (the same one for which the OLE DB driver was written) has finally passed the proof-of-concept stage (phew). I now have lots and lots of tidbits, tricks and

Re: [HACKERS] Case preserving - suggestions

2004-06-07 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Robert Treat wrote: On Sunday 06 June 2004 13:47, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Hi list, A postgresql migration I am doing (the same one for which the OLE DB driver was written) has finally passed the proof-of-concept stage (phew). I now have lots and lots of tidbits, tricks and tips for SQL Server mig

Re: [HACKERS] Case preserving - suggestions

2004-06-07 Thread Robert Treat
On Sunday 06 June 2004 13:47, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Hi list, > > A postgresql migration I am doing (the same one for which the OLE DB > driver was written) has finally passed the proof-of-concept stage > (phew). I now have lots and lots of tidbits, tricks and tips for SQL > Server migration, whi

Re: [HACKERS] Case preserving - suggestions

2004-06-06 Thread Tom Lane
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One problem detected during that stage, however, was that the program > pretty much relies on the collation being case insensitive. I am now > trying to gather the info regarding adding case preserving to > Postgresql. I already suggested that we do

[HACKERS] Case preserving - suggestions

2004-06-06 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Hi list, A postgresql migration I am doing (the same one for which the OLE DB driver was written) has finally passed the proof-of-concept stage (phew). I now have lots and lots of tidbits, tricks and tips for SQL Server migration, which I would love to put online. Is pgFoundry the right place?