t; Thanks, Dave.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 27 October 2003 02:50
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports (Win32 Client)
> >
&g
Yup, that works fine (just a few warnings about ERROR being redefined).
Thanks, Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 October 2003 02:50
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for p
This is all fixed in CVS --- would you try that?
---
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 26 October 2003 01:35
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Postgre
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 October 2003 01:35
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports
>
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077:
> 'C:\PROGRA~1\MICROS~3\VC98\BIN\NMAKE.EXE' :
> > return co
>
