Tomas Vondra writes:
> On 14.5.2014 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I'm afraid it's more in the year range from what i've seen. I.e. not
>> practical.
> Yeah, that wouldn't be very practical. I'll try to run it though and if
> it'd run more than a few days, I'll switch it to CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.
On 14.5.2014 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-05-14 21:04:41 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Apparently there's something wrong wi
Hi,
On 2014-05-14 21:04:41 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>> Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
> >>
> >> Man. I shoul
On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
>>
>> Man. I shouldn't have asked... My code. There's some output in there
>> that's
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> And why does the header
>> comment for RelationGetIndexList make no mention of this new side-effect?
>> Somebody did a seriously poor job of adding this functionality to
>> relcache.
> It's not like it's not documented: Ther
On 2014-05-14 13:32:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> And why does the header
> >> comment for RelationGetIndexList make no mention of this new side-effect?
> >> Somebody did a seriously poor job of adding this functionality to
On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> My gut feeling says it's in RelationGetIndexList().
>
> > Nearly right. It's in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(). Fix attached.
>
> TBH, I don't believe this patch at all
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> My gut feeling says it's in RelationGetIndexList().
> Nearly right. It's in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(). Fix attached.
TBH, I don't believe this patch at all. Where exactly is rd_replidindex
reset? If it's supposed
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
>
> Man. I shouldn't have asked... My code. There's some output in there
> that's probably triggered by the extraordinarily long
